Overview

When I went on my very first silent retreat, what surprised me most was how naturally the silence settled in. .The need to fill space falls away. In its place, something else begins to open, and what arose within that silence was far more surprising than the silence itself

There is a book by MIT researcher Sherry Turkle called Alone Together. It is about technology, about how our devices leave us lonely in company, connected to everyone and close to no one. But alone together is also, word for word, the best description I know of what happens inside a silent meditation retreat.

At a retreat, dozens of people practice meditation in the same space for days or weeks at a time. No one speaks. And yet something communal is unmistakably present, a collective turning inward you can feel in the room. Where technology gives us the sensation of company while emptying its substance, a silent retreat gives us solitude so complete it opens, paradoxically, into a sense of profound connection.

I have been sitting in that paradox for a decade and more. I spent the month of March at Spirit Rock Meditation Center in Northern California, my first month-long retreat and my thirteenth in as many years. With two growing children at home, even a week away has often felt like a rare privilege. These periods have come to feel like a generous gift, made possible by my husband and children, whose support I carry with deep gratitude.

What a silent meditation retreat actually is

People sometimes imagine a silent retreat as an arduous marathon of meditation, or perhaps a peaceful escape from daily life. It is neither.

At the Buddhist retreats I have attended, the day begins at five in the morning. There are no devices, no reading, no music, no conversations. Formal sitting and walking meditations alternate throughout the day, and meals and daily chores are folded into the practice too. Everything is simplified until the mind has very little else to do but be present. The whole structure of the retreat holds the logistics, allowing your energy to turn inward and mindfulness to become continuous.

A retreat is not a vacation. Charlotte Joko Beck described the experience in a Zen meditation hall plainly.

A zendo is not a place for bliss and relaxation, but a furnace room for the combustion of our egoistic delusions. What tools do we need to use? Only one. We’ve all heard of it, yet we use it very seldom. It’s called attention.

Deep practice, sustained over days of silence, works like a refining fire, holding conditions steady long enough for what is false or habitual to burn away on its own. What is left tends to be clearer and truer than what we usually take ourselves to be.

Silent retreat is not for everyone. For people carrying certain kinds of psychological difficulty, extended silence can amplify rather than settle what is already overwhelming. A foundation in meditation practice is useful before stepping into a retreat like this.

The form I discuss here is Buddhist, though the understanding it rests on is old and wide. The Indigenous vision quest, the Aboriginal walkabout, the Jewish hitbodedut, the Christian desert tradition: across cultures and centuries, people have known that something essential becomes audible only when you turn away from the world long enough to hear it.

The surprising gift of silence

When I went on my very first silent retreat, I was apprehensive. I love to talk, to connect. The idea of sitting in silence for ten days felt daunting. Could I actually do this?

What surprised me most was how naturally the silence settled in. When everyone around you is silent and the day’s structure carries you from one practice period to the next, the mind finds its own rhythm. There is no one to talk to, and after a while, no particular desire to. The need to fill space falls away. In its place, something else begins to open, and what arose within that silence was far more surprising than the silence itself.

Two kinds of knowing

Retreat surfaces things you didn’t go looking for. Over the years, I’ve noticed two kinds.

The first is personal. In the stillness, certain patterns become visible: habitual ways of thinking, dynamics in relationships, places where I have caused harm without quite realizing it. Forgotten grief. Repressed fear. Some of those things have been buried deep, shaping my world without my knowing. Seeing them clearly is its own liberation. They lose their grip. Pico Iyer writes in his memoir Aflame: Learning from Silence about his retreats at a Benedictine monastery in Big Sur. He observes that people often arrive hoping to escape something and find instead that they run right up against it in the silence. That is the nature of the first kind of knowing. It finds you whether you are looking for it or not.

The second kind is harder to describe: impersonal or universal, when something beyond personal history comes into view.

One such moment has stayed with me. At Spirit Rock on a warm afternoon, it began to drizzle. The ground was hot, and as I watched, each raindrop fell and evaporated almost the instant it landed, a tiny arising and disappearing, over and over. Because my mind was still and concentrated, that moment cracked open a truth I thought I already knew: that everything arises and passes away. The raindrop, the thought, the relationships, you and I, the stars themselves. We know this intellectually. But this was different. It shifted something I can only call a landscape in the mind, and I have felt the freedom of that shift ever since.

Not all such moments arrive peacefully. During a walking period one morning, a memory surfaced without warning: my grandfather’s funeral, and my grandmother wailing as they carried his body out for cremation. “Koda eddukku!” she cried in Malayalam. “Take his umbrella!” To burn alongside him. I was twelve. It was my first encounter with death. It was my first encounter with the knowledge that nothing we love gets to stay.

The memory brought with it a thought, sudden and almost violent in its clarity: EVERYTHING MUST GO. I began to sob. There was real grief in it, not only for my grandfather but for all the goodness and love and beauty that accumulate in a life and must, one day, be relinquished. There was also grief for the self I have come to love and cling to, the one I call “me.” The retreat created space to hold that grief without drama. By the time I returned to the hall, something had released. The heart that emerged was roomier than the one that had gone in.

One of my teachers, Gil Fronsdal, has spoken of how, in time, the practice starts to do the practitioner. Over many retreats, I have learned to trust this. There is a process unfolding that the practitioner does not manage so much as allow.

When knowing is not enough

There comes a point in any sincere spiritual life when understanding is no longer the question. We may know the language of Advaita or of Buddhist sutras. We may even recognize the patterns as they arise: the contraction, the grasping. But still something remains unchanged. The knowing only sits in the mind. It has not moved into our body, or sunk into our bones, into the way we actually live and respond and relate. There is a gap between what we understand and what we are.

Retreat closes that gap. As I explored in an earlier piece, the wisdom we are seeking is already present within us, the way Michelangelo described the sculpture as already living inside the marble.

What Guru Nitya found in silence

My own guru, Nitya Chaitanya Yati, undertook an unbroken vow of silence lasting eighteen months in the 1950s. He retreated to a small outbuilding near his family home in Kerala, cut himself off from newspapers and visitors, and spent his days in quiet contemplation.

The first days were not peaceful. In his autobiography, Love and Blessings, he describes the initial experience as falling “into a great abyss, somewhat like Alice going down the rabbit hole.” There was fear and intense loneliness. He wrote about a sense that the ground had been pulled away. But he stayed.

Over time, something changed. What he noticed first was a loosening of two mental habits. The first was the tendency to hook each passing thought onto a chain of associated memories, and the second was the compulsive need to resolve every question the mind posed. Both simply fell away.

He began to sit with plants as if they were friends. He would listen for hours to water moving over pebbles in a nearby brook. He noticed, for the first time, that a flowering bush and a flowerless bush were equally full of life. What emerged from the crucible of his solitude was a transformed quality of perception, one that later found expression in his life and work.

Reading his account across the distance of decades, what strikes me is how precisely that arc mirrors what so many practitioners discover. The fear at the threshold which slowly unwinds into a new way of seeing the world. That sight was always possible but had never had the conditions to emerge.

Alone together

Each person at retreat takes on a daily work meditation, washing dishes, cleaning toilets, sweeping floors, chopping vegetables, so that no one has to think about the logistics of living. This frees the mind to stay with the practice. When many people meditate in the same space over many days, something else happens. There is a resonance where each person’s stillness deepens the stillness available to everyone else.

Being alone together like this is quite different from loneliness; the two are, I think, nearly opposites. Some of the fullest moments I have known have been in silence, in the company of strangers also turned inward, each sitting with something I can only call vast. In the Yoga tradition there is a word for this, kaivalya. This describes an aloneness in which the sense of separation dissolves and you find you are not apart from anything at all. I have had moments in retreat when this boundary between inside and outside simply becomes unconvincing. The practice and the practitioner, the silence and the one sitting in it, no longer feel like separate things.

Does duration matter?

Yes, meaningfully so.

In a week-long retreat, the first few days are spent just unwinding from everyday life. Then the body settles, the mind begins to quiet, and just as the practice is deepening, it’s time to go home. There is real value in a shorter retreat. But there is also a kind of longing at the end, a sense of having only just arrived somewhere interesting.

I remember how much mental energy my early retreats consumed. Was I walking slowly enough? Was I doing this right? In the days before a teacher interview, I would find myself rehearsing what I planned to say, then second-guessing whether it sounded too eager to impress. By the third or fourth retreat, that layer had dissolved.

In this month-long retreat, I had time I have not had before. Time to let the unwinding happen more fully. Time to move into states of deep concentration, samadhi in Sanskrit, that I’d touched before but not been able to inhabit in quite the same way. Samadhi is often translated as “concentration,” but that word undersells it. It is more like a gathering of the whole mind: a steadiness, an interior quiet that has nothing fragile about it, sometimes opening into spaciousness or luminosity.

What becomes possible in that depth of stillness is something I find hard to overstate.

What retreats have given me

Over thirteen years and thirteen retreats, something has shifted. I find myself less reactive, less given to grievance. Joy comes more readily. The things that used to snag and hold, old resentments, anxious anticipations, adhere less than they used to. I find a growing trust in life itself. Most importantly, my capacity to hold suffering, my own and that of others, has deepened. None of this arrived all at once. It is the slow work of daily sitting and periodic retreat, each deepening the other.

Whatever freedom and compassion these years have cultivated in me, their real measure is whether they make me more present for others, more capable of care. As a teacher, the evolution of my own practice helps me teach from a more authentic place. I have come to appreciate the beauty and selflessness of practicing not just for myself, but for the benefit of all beings.

The heart opens

The most moving moments of my retreat life have been the simplest. A gopher poking its head out of the earth during slow walking meditation, and finding myself in tears, only with a flooding sense of connection with this small, blinking creature. A spider’s web suspended between two bushes in the morning light, each node hung with a dewdrop, each dewdrop catching the sun. Standing transfixed before it, feeling in my entire body the intricate, luminous web of life.

When the mind gets very quiet, everything becomes interesting. A twig. A shadow. The quality of light through a window. The sound of wind in dry grass. These things are always there, always extraordinary, and usually invisible to us.

March gave me more of those moments than any retreat before it, and I am still discovering what changed. The heart-mind is far larger than we give it credit for. And the life that becomes possible when you have touched that vastness, even briefly, is different from the one you were living before.


This article was first published on myndtree.org.

The views and opinions expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of India Currents. Any content provided by our bloggers or authors are of their opinion and are not intended to malign any religion, ethnic group, organization, individual or anyone or anything.

Medical disclaimer: This article is provided for educational and informational purposes only and the information provided should not be used for diagnosing or treating a health problem or disease. Please consult with your doctor, licensed physician or other qualified health provider for personal medical advice and medical conditions.

Gayathri Narayanan is the founder of Myndtree and a contemplative guide whose work centers on integrating deep inner inquiry with the realities of modern life.