Estimated reading time: 4 minutes

There is an urgent need for India to educate and actively engage U.S.-born Indian Americans. Educational institutions and philanthropists should collaborate to develop immersive study tours for college-aged Indian Americans that expose them to the true realities of modern India, including its religious diversity, complex democracy, and its advanced tech industry, healthcare facilities, and other infrastructure. Family trips to India present a narrow slice of the country and are not a substitute for a broader immersion experience. Without such an initiative, India risks losing the vast benefits it currently enjoys from its diaspora in the United States.

India is the world’s top recipient of remittances, receiving a staggering $135 billion from its diaspora in the last fiscal year—a significant amount of it from the United States. These remittances account for 3–4% of India’s GDP, directly supporting household welfare, rural development, and economic stability. Additionally, in 2023 alone, Indian Americans gave over $1 billion in philanthropic donations.  

Yet, the powerful impact of the Indian diaspora in the United States is at risk of fraying. If American-born Indian children do not develop a better understanding of and connection to modern India, India stands to lose not only vital economic support, but also diplomatic and technological linkages nurtured by a culturally engaged diaspora.

A 2024 survey by the Carnegie Endowment found that only 46% of U.S.-born Indian Americans communicate monthly with friends or family in India, compared to 71% of foreign citizens from India. Just 58% of U.S.-born Indian Americans watched Indian television or films in the past month, versus 77% of foreign citizens. From my two decades teaching in higher education—mostly at Cornell Law School—I have met virtually no Indian American students who demonstrated a nuanced understanding of India beyond its dance and food.

Today, about 5.2 million Indian Americans live in the United States. One-third—approximately 1.8 million—were born here. Without intentional efforts to nurture their connection to India, I fear that in 30 to 40 years, as the first generation of immigrants passes on, India may lose the extraordinary benefits its diaspora currently provides it.

Moreover, a new cohort of immigrants may never replenish this loss, especially if U.S. immigration policies remain restrictive. Even if pathways stay open, many highly skilled Indians may choose not to move to the United States—finding increasing opportunity and prosperity at home.  

Other diaspora communities have long recognized the necessity of engaging their second generations. The most successful example is the Jewish diaspora, which funds 10-day heritage trips to Israel for young adults aged 18 to 26. The program, known as “Birthright Israel,” is sponsored by the Birthright Israel Foundation, whose donors subsidize participation.  Founded in 1994 by philanthropists Charles Bronfman and Michael Steinhardt in partnership with the Israeli government, Birthright has attracted major donors such as Sheldon and Miriam Adelson, who contributed more than $500 million

By 2020, Pew Research estimated that around 25% of American Jews ages 18–46 had participated in Birthright. It is widely regarded as the most influential organization shaping relations between Israel and its diaspora. Over one million Jewish people worldwide have taken part in heritage tours.  Studies have found that Birthright participants become more connected to and engaged with multiple domains of Jewish life after returning from the trip.

The Indian and Jewish diasporas in the United States are both prominent, highly educated, and economically successful communities, but to be sure, the Jewish diaspora is very different than the Indian diaspora.  The connection of Jewish Americans to Israel is often ideological, religious, and institutional. On the other hand, the connection of Indian Americans to India is often familial, cultural, and economic rather than ideological.  This, in part, is because Indian Americans are likely much more diverse than Jewish Americans in terms of religion, language, and political views.  Despite these differences between the communities, a fully funded immersion experience about modern India for Indian Americans can still be beneficial in strengthening their connections to India and understanding its role as a global international power.

Although the Indian government has initiated a travel program they call “Know India” for college-aged Indian Americans, some Indian Americans might be concerned that the government of India would not be able to provide an unbiased view of India. Indian American philanthropists, educational institutions, and community leaders must come together now to build and sustain heritage programs that truly engage the next generation. Without immediate, coordinated action, we risk watching the invaluable connection between India and its American-born diaspora unravel, along with the economic, diplomatic, and political benefits it brings. 

The time to act is now. Indian American donors and institutions must invest in the future of this relationship by creating meaningful opportunities for young Indian Americans to discover and embrace their heritage in a way that shows them the true marvels of and complexities of modern India from a neutral lens with robust educational and professional engagement elements. The future of the relationship between India and its diaspora depends on the choices we make today.

Professor Sital Kalantry is the Founding Director of the Roundglass India Center at Seattle University and Professor of Law

The views and opinions expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of India Currents. Any content provided by our bloggers or authors are of their opinion and are not intended to malign any religion, ethnic group, organization, individual or anyone or anything.

Professor Sital Kalantry is a tenured professor, associate dean, and founder of the India Center. She is an expert in comparative law, business and human rights, feminist legal theory, and contract law....