User Comments
| Manu Acharya | Nov 15, 2006 15:21:26 |
| MADHU SHARMA there may be a few inspirations behind your writing that awefully pathetic article. First may be because you belong to the same generation as Shahid Parvez. Your sadness may be because - you could do nothing, while Shahid Parvez, deservedly, has gone on to become one of the all-time greatests. Second may be that you are a Nikhil 'FANATIC' (definitely not a fan) and you will cross swords with anyone who says there can be people other than Nikhil who can do music. Definitely people, who feel Vilayat Khan or Ravi Sankar could do music, will have to face your sword. Beware you fans of Vilayat Khan and Ravi Sankar. Third may be because you have no understanding of music at all. You definitely haven't heard Vilayat Khan or Ravi Sankar at their prime. Shahid's is not a copied music, dont forget he is the grandson of Wahed Khan uncle and teacher of Vilayat Khan. He was born into the ImdadKhani Gharana and he has re-introduced layakari and tantrakari into Imdadkhani baaj. ..... However,leave it, there is no meaning replying to someone who has not even the slightest knowledge of music. However Teed Rockwell's article is very indepth and we see that Teed's understanding of music is of the highest level. Nice article Teed. |
|
| derek roberts | Oct 26, 2006 19:25:10 |
| hi I am the head of production at Sense.I would like to say that in all the time I have spent working with musicians. I feel Shahid is THE complete player, in that he does not suffer from the over competetiveness many top or aspiring musicians suffer from. His technical ability,attention to detail and emotional depth is second to none and it is genuine. It is the mind that allows these qualities to shine through and if a musician's intentions are pure enough the listener can often sense this.I feel many classical musicians generally need to consider working more deeply on themselves from a spiritual perspective if they want to reach greater heights in their music. It is not just technique after all. All creative people have to open a door within themselves for the real transcendant beauty of music to come flowing through. these qualities are not stable in our minds unless we really work at the 'inner' aspect and it will be the case that Shahid will not always get the conditions right. You can be well trained at playing sitar but may not be so well trained at mastering your mind. | |
| Madhu Sharma | Oct 21, 2006 15:53:02 |
| I 100% agree that ustad shahid parvez is world's greatest Sitar player but i wish he could be the world's greatest "music" player. please ..please...avoid to torture the soul of nikhil benerji. it should be resting somewhere in deep silence.... only bones and mussels can not bring the music. Though i am shahid's ardent fan, but he still has to work to create music on sitar and have to give up "Karishma- Bazi". i think that stage will also come when he will come up from the ego- generated from the frustrations. he is in transit.... where he is showing to the world... hey... look ..look.. this is the sitar... have you seen sitar? look ... this is the sitar... and look at me... it is me...who is playing this sitar... you can also judge it from his body language... thanks for the beautiful article... but please try to understad the difference between sitar playing and music playing... madhu sharma |
|